wp6f906e81.png
wp91074f43.jpg
wpa4923fff.jpg
wp0fe7637b.jpg
wp54b53ef2.jpg

Harold Hall

Workshop Processes

wpcd02818c.png
wpcd02818c.png
wpcd02818c.png

If it were of importance then the material can then be set to run true at the jaws whilst it is being supported centrally by the steady. I say, can,  but this will almost certainly attempt to move the material off centre at the steady. To over come this the part should only be held using just the ends of the jaws, say 8mm. However, this approach should only be adopted with caution and due consideration to the nature of the intended machining, heavy or light, intermittent or continuous.

 

When the reverse in the case, that is a long but a small diameter piece of material, the method of setting the steady is different. In this case the material is set to run true at the chuck's jaws and the steady set at this point. With that done the steady can be slid along the lathe's bed and secured towards the outer end. With the material being slightly flexible the steady would easily pull it into line. If your three jaw chuck is reasonably accurate, say within 0.05mm TIR then this should be adequate for smaller diameters at longer lengths, say 10mm by 200mm long. The viewer may ask why there has to be two methods of setting the jaws. This is because small diameters will, if setting the steady at the end of a long length, easily deflect when the first and second arms are set.

 

Deflection Measured

For a recent project it was necessary for me to set up the steady for three differing pieces of material and I chose to carry out some tests.

 

In one case the diameter of the material was 20mm and projected from the chuck by 300mm. Testing this using the fingers I found it quite easy to deflect so chose to be more precise. I set up a DTI and measure the deflection that occurred when I placed a vee block weighing 700grams on the end. This resulted in a deflection  of 0.1mm. Unsupported, the end of the bar gave a total indicator reading of 0.3mm when turned by hand and from these I considered the steady could easily pull the material into line.

 

Having taken the readings I set the steady adjacent to the chuck, Photograph 1  and then moved it close to the end to machine the two bushes required, Photograph 2. The task took a few minutes  during which the arms became only slightly warm, from which I concluded that the set up had been satisfactory.

 

A second task was to hold a 38mm diameter bar with a projection from the chuck of 150mm. Carrying out the same test with the vee block gave no readable deflection and so was definitely a candidate for setting the material to run true at the point the steady was to be used. A third task was with a 32mm diameter bar extending 280mm which gave a reading of 0.02mm and again needed to be set true at the point the steady was to be used.

Fixed Steady, Using
Fixed Steady, Using
wpe7285997.png

 1

wp2feaea83.png

 2